Jump to content

ProconRulz - Sniper limiter v2.7 by Tarreltje


ImportBot

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by eisvogel*:

 

...we have the same situation :sad:

Procon and ProConRulz latest versions, BF4.def manually overwritten (it was the actuall one) but tarreltjes script wont run.

The older script from sagittaire88 works without the DMRs. If Tarreltjes script activated and trace rules switched on we see nearly the same actions. Can anybody (with working script) post the bf4.def? What entries must in there? Would it help to post a part from our rulz action for investigation?

1. stop the layer server

2. upload the bf4.def from your HD /procon_1.4.1.3/Configs/bf4.def

3. ftp to layer/Configs/bf4.def

4. restart your layer

5. Rulz .txt filenames proconrulz_yoursniperrulz.txt or other

 

this worked for me :smile:

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment
  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Originally Posted by tarreltje*:

 

What would I have to change in order to have a per team sniper limit, along with Obliteration also having sniper limit?

Thanks in advance.

The rules will work with every mode that has 2 teams
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Ralphvd*:

 

Is it me or the new limiter isnt working? (old one is working but no DMR limiter)

 

Since 1-12-2013 i havent changed it and was working fine, but now i overruled the txt. and it isnt working good anymore. I went back to the default that comes with procon 44. Need some tweaks now for dmr again :S

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by tarreltje*:

 

Is it me or the new limiter isnt working? (old one is working but no DMR limiter)

 

Since 1-12-2013 i havent changed it and was working fine, but now i overruled the txt. and it isnt working good anymore. I went back to the default that comes with procon 44. Need some tweaks now for dmr again :S

Is your layer updated with the latest proconrulz? Is your bf4.DEF updated?

 

I have the rulz running on my server without any problems!

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Ralphvd*:

 

Yes and it worked like a charm before.

 

I will update again tonight when server is empty. And let you know.

 

The DMR arent recognized as sniper kill. Sniper rifle does.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by tarreltje*:

 

Do you have the 2.4 /2.5 code? So i can test it that one is working fine with dmr?

i use the 2.6, the latest one, and it is working fine, i my self use the DMR's alot, and its working
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Ralphvd*:

 

i use the 2.6, the latest one, and it is working fine, i my self use the DMR's alot, and its working

I have updated proconrulz again to the latest version, i am using the sniperdmrlimit.txt and now it is working as intented. I must say this is getting quite good. !setsniper is a nice one!

Great work!

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by tarreltje*:

 

I have updated proconrulz again to the latest version, i am using the sniperdmrlimit.txt and now it is working as intented. I must say this is getting quite good. !setsniper is a nice one!

Great work!

the sniperdmrlimit.txt are my rules changed by bambam, and he has added them to proconrulz. My rules are different, and contain less log spam ect!!
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by jking54*:

 

the sniperdmrlimit.txt are my rules changed by bambam, and he has added them to proconrulz. My rules are different, and contain less log spam ect!!

So to be clear, 2.6 are the most current?
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by tarreltje*:

 

So to be clear, 2.6 are the most current?

My version is a tweaked version by me and bambam. He used this version in his txt files and added it with proconrulz!!

 

My version has all the sniper rifles included, with some extra tolerated kills made by snipers! I also removed almost all the loggin you can see in procon, alot of admins said there was to much spam in the procon log.

 

I myself prefer my set of rules, because it has all what you need, but feel free to use bambam rules, they are basicly the same!

 

So its up to you!

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by LordMaxxie*:

 

The rules will work with every mode that has 2 teams

So %server_sniperlimit% 3 would limit snipers to 3 per team? Or 3 overall?

That's what I don't get.

 

Thanks,

Maxxie.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by tarreltje*:

 

How do i disable it killing people for using DMR's though?

i have updated the rules on the first page, i made 1 version with both bolt and dmr weapons, and 1 version with only bolt action weapons
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by SPIDY-NL*:

 

srry im a realy Newb concerning scripting

 

we have a Server with a adaptive Gamemodes TDM-CQ

on TDM we want to limit sniping but not on Conquest how do we implement this the best way

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by tarreltje*:

 

What are the pros and cons of no DMR or having them?

Admins tend to see the bolt action snipers as the main campers on their servers, so the main reason for a sniper limit. While you can camp with a dmr, its much harder to get kills with on the long range, and on my server some players already said that dmr arent real sniper weapons.

 

I my self have also removed them from the sniper limit. i also see them as a sort of slow assault weapon :P

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.