Jump to content

MULTIbalancer [1.1.6.0] 30-MAR-2015 + BFHL


Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

most of the unstacking settings are the default ones. i think the amount of unstack and group size are un-touched.

 

could the default settings be a bit 2 much ? (talking about conquest large).

It depends on your number of tickets. The larger the max tickets, the larger you should set the unstack percentages. However, I wouldn't go above 200%. If one team has 800 tickets and the other has 400, no amount of swapping is going to make for a happy server. It might narrow the gap, but lots of players will rage. 120-150 is good.

 

You should also increase the definition of Early and Late phase (see previous post) and make sure the percentages for Late phase are 0,0,0.

 

As a rough estimate, you should shoot for 1 unstacking swap (so that's two player moves) for every 100 tickets of max tickets. 600 tickets should be set to 6 swaps max. 1000 to 10 swaps max, etc.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment
  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally Posted by xFaNtASyGiRLx*:

 

Here's what I have for my Aftermath server where MB is working perfect (blitz helped set this up for me).

 

1200 tickets.

 

Posted Image

 

 

 

Posted Image

 

Code:

Command: gen cl
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Max Players: 64
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Check Team Stacking After First Minutes: 10
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Max Unstacking Swaps Per Round: 12
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Number Of Swaps Per Group: 1
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Delay Seconds Between Swap Groups: 120
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Determine Strong Players By: RoundSPM
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Percent Of Top Of Team Is Strong: 40
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Disperse Evenly For Rank >=: 0
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Enable Disperse Evenly List: True
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Definition Of High Population For Players >=: 48
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Definition Of Low Population For Players <=: 16
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Definition Of Early Phase As Tickets From Start: 400
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Definition Of Late Phase As Tickets From End: 300
8 - Settings for Conquest Large|Conquest Large: Enable Scrambler: True
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by kcuestag*:

 

I can give you access to my Layer if needed, I run 600-800 tickets for Conquest Large deppending on the map (And Assault for Karkand, Sharqi, Wake Island and Talah Market).

 

Also, a friend who complained about several moves per round is indeed Colonel 100, why would he be moved more than once coz of his rank?

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

I can give you access to my Layer if needed, I run 600-800 tickets for Conquest Large deppending on the map (And Assault for Karkand, Sharqi, Wake Island and Talah Market).

 

Also, a friend who complained about several moves per round is indeed Colonel 100, why would he be moved more than once coz of his rank?

Because you have Disperse Evenly For Rank >= set tp 145. Change that to 0 and that won't happen anymore. You also won't have dispersal of Colonel 100, but it sounds like you don't want that anyway.

 

That said ... I think there is a defect in move counting also, similar to the clan tag bug -- it is respected for balancing, but not unstacking. I'll fix that in the patch as well.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by kcuestag*:

 

Because you have Disperse Evenly For Rank >= set tp 145. Change that to 0 and that won't happen anymore. You also won't have dispersal of Colonel 100, but it sounds like you don't want that anyway.

 

That said ... I think there is a defect in move counting also, similar to the clan tag bug -- it is respected for balancing, but not unstacking. I'll fix that in the patch as well.

Thanks, I'd love having the disperse evenly for lvl 145 guys, as long as that means 145 colonels DO NOT keep getting switched, maybe if it had a limit of 1 move/unstack per round that would be nice for next version. :smile:
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by xFaNtASyGiRLx*:

 

p.s. it would be great if some of the testers for MB posted feed back in here and possibly share some of the settings that work for them. Cause in talking to a couple of other admins who haven't posted is "no, they decided not to use it because of the QQ on their servers when they did.

 

I think its a great plugin that just needs some tweaking and looks a bit overwhelming at first.

 

I also think some of the crying/whining on the servers will subside once players get used to it. *my personal experience in using this plugin across 11 servers.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by EBassie*:

 

p.s. it would be great if some of the testers for MB posted feed back in here and possibly share some of the settings that work for them. Cause in talking to a couple of other admins who haven't posted is "no, they decided not to use it because of the QQ on their servers when they did.

 

I think its a great plugin that just needs some tweaking and looks a bit overwhelming at first.

 

I also think some of the crying/whining on the servers will subside once players get used to it. *my personal experience in using this plugin across 11 servers.

It would also help if admins read the documentation. Yes, this plugin has a learning curve (I don't completely understand it myself at this time).

 

But without reading the documentation you don't understand what it does and why there is QQ from the players :ohmy:

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by HexaCanon*:

 

Sure. Do you think that would be better than RoundKDR?

For 2000 ticket metro maybe, found out that most players with high kdr are basically campers.

 

High kpm might be more aggressive style, which what you need to turn the table around in metro.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

It would also help if admins read the documentation. Yes, this plugin has a learning curve (I don't completely understand it myself at this time).

Yeah, it's looking like the Presets and defaults work fine for most game modes, particularly 32 player or less, but not for Conquest Large at 64 players for more than 400 tickets. Maybe I should add a Preset Wizard for Conquest Large 64. You enter your max tickets and whether you want to minimize complaining/rage quiting (true/false) and it adjusts the Conquest Large per-mode settings for you. I guess I could make that be an any-mode wizard: enter your mode, your max tickets, and whether you want complaining/rage quitting minimized.

 

I think I'll change the default for Disperse by Rank to be 0, also. That's another big source of QQ.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Jaythegreat1*:

 

Yeah, it's looking like the Presets and defaults work fine for most game modes, particularly 32 player or less, but not for Conquest Large at 64 players for more than 400 tickets. Maybe I should add a Preset Wizard for Conquest Large 64. You enter your max tickets and whether you want to minimize complaining/rage quiting (true/false) and it adjusts the Conquest Large per-mode settings for you. I guess I could make that be an any-mode wizard: enter your mode, your max tickets, and whether you want complaining/rage quitting minimized.

 

I think I'll change the default for Disperse by Rank to be 0, also. That's another big source of QQ.

Indeed....

 

I also changed

 

Max Unstacks Per round to 4

Max Number of Swaps per group to 2

Forbid Switching to Biggest Team to False while leaving WInning Team to True

 

and notices a lot less QQing in chat and EOTR results. Will keep monitoring today and see if the trend continues.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

Here's what I have for my Aftermath server where MB is working perfect (blitz helped set this up for me).

What's the max players and max tickets for this set-up? I'll post this in the collected settings thread*.
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

Indeed....

 

I also changed

 

Max Unstacks Per round to 4

Max Number of Swaps per group to 2

 

and notices a lot less QQing in chat and EOTR results. Will keep monitoring today and see if the trend continues.

That's the right idea. What's your delay?
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by kcuestag*:

 

What's the max players and max tickets for this set-up? I'll post this in the collected settings thread*.

Very interesting, I'm wondering what the best settings would be for Conquest Large 600-800 tickets.
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

For 2000 ticket metro maybe, found out that most players with high kdr are basically campers.

 

High kpm might be more aggressive style, which what you need to turn the table around in metro.

In that case, isn't RoundSPM the same thing? It's just KPM multiplied by 100. :smile: Unless you think medics rezzing people or recon detecting people skews the SPM too much. I got most of my recon detection medals playing Metro ...
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by kcuestag*:

 

Quick question PapaCharlie9, if silent mode is set to True, supposedly the unstack messages should be private and only shown to the players being moved/unstacked, but I think everyone can see the unstacked messages, or maybe I can see them because I'm the admin? (I cannot see the ones when someone tries to switch to winning team, but I can see the unstacked messages).

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Blitz*:

 

In that case, isn't RoundSPM the same thing? It's just KPM multiplied by 100. :smile: Unless you think medics rezzing people or recon detecting people skews the SPM too much. I got most of my recon detection medals playing Metro ...

To be honest I think RoundSPM is a better measure. Rezzing and capping is just as important as killing. AT least this is what we find with our server.
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by xFaNtASyGiRLx*:

 

What's the max players and max tickets for this set-up? I'll post this in the collected settings thread*.

64, Aftermath 1200 tickets.

 

edit- oops sorry just saw it was already posted.

 

Anyone else got settings that work for them that they want to share? particularly for CTF- 64?

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Blitz*:

 

If anyone wants help with the plugin I am willing to help. Every server is different and requires that you be patient, read the documentation a couple times, soak it in, change settings and monitor the reactions of players and see the progress of the tickets, balancing and unstacking. This plugin will require a lot of tweaking to get it set up so that it works well for your server. In the end I believe it is well worth the time invested.

 

I am volunteering to help admin's who need help to set it up. I will guide you through the settings. Again, this requires a lot of time to tweak to your liking so what you truly want in the end will probably still need some monitoring and tweaking on your end. Once it's set up correctly, everyone is happy and you should see more excitement on your server. This is currently NOT a turn-key solution to solving balancing and unstacking on all servers. I think if Papa were to incorporate his idea of a wizard it would make setting up this plugin MUCH more turn-key for everyone.

 

PM me, include temporary account info for your layer (or I can set it up via a teamviewer session) and send voice info. We will go through the plugin and I will help set it up based on your flavor.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Jaythegreat1*:

 

So far so good on the changes I made... although I did forget I was runing 0, 120, 150 instead of 0, 120, 120. Only noticed 1 fairly lopsided game (200+ Ticket Differential), but I was averaging around 125 ticket differential. I have changed mine back to 0, 120, 120... we'll see if it makes the games a bit closer with out QQ.

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Imisnew2*:

 

I don't know if it's been posted before, but I would delay swapping anyone until 5-10 minutes into the round. Additionally, I wouldn't swap anyone if there is less than 50 tickets on either team.

 

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

I don't know if it's been posted before, but I would delay swapping anyone until 5-10 minutes into the round. Additionally, I wouldn't swap anyone if there is less than 50 tickets on either team.

Agreed. :smile: Those are both configurable settings. The default is 10 minutes. The "50 tickets" is mode dependent, but generally covers the last 25% to 33% of tickets.
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

Quick question PapaCharlie9, if silent mode is set to True, supposedly the unstack messages should be private and only shown to the players being moved/unstacked, but I think everyone can see the unstacked messages, or maybe I can see them because I'm the admin? (I cannot see the ones when someone tries to switch to winning team, but I can see the unstacked messages).

EDIT: nevermind, definitely a bug

 

Viva K! You are my number #1 bug finder! Where were you during the testing phase? :smile:

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by PapaCharlie9*:

 

Version 1.0 patch 1 was the shortest lived patch ever! I wish I had read the forum first, I could have included the Quiet Mode fix in patch 1. Oh well, at least all known bugs are fixed now.

 

Patch 2 - 1.0.2.0

 

* Fixed Quiet Mode bug

 

Patch 1 - 1.0.1.0

 

* Fixed Same Clan Tags In Squad unstacking bug

* Fixed problem with some non-Colonel 100 players being moved multiple times (unstacking)

* Changed default for Disperse By Rank to 0

* Added RoundKPM

* Added Enable Unstacking preset

 


BIG GIGANTIC NOTICE TO ALL USERS OF 1.0.0.0


 

By default, the new Enable Unstacking setting is set to False. That means that if you were happily using unstacking before, after you upgrade, unstacking will be disabled.

*** You must set Enable Unstacking to True to enable unstacking again. ***

None of your settings will be changed either way, this is just a big throw-switch to turn the whole feature on or off.

 

The motivation for this change was the observation that some admins are trying out the plugin and abandoning it due to complaints from players, no doubt in large part due to unstacking not being fine-tuned. So let's start everyone out with unstacking off and then admins who take the time to study the settings and learn how to fly his Space Shuttle cockpit complexity plugin can opt-in to using unstacking. I should have done this the first time around. You don't get a second chance at a first impression!

 

Screenshot of MULTIbalancer settings:

Posted Image

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by Blitz*:

 

Version 1.0 patch 1 was the shortest lived patch ever! I wish I had read the forum first, I could have included the Quiet Mode fix in patch 1. Oh well, at least all known bugs are fixed now.

 

Patch 2 - 1.0.2.0

 

* Fixed Quiet Mode bug

 

Patch 1 - 1.0.1.0

 

* Fixed Same Clan Tags In Squad unstacking bug

* Fixed problem with some non-Colonel 100 players being moved multiple times (unstacking)

* Changed default for Disperse By Rank to 0

* Added RoundKPM

* Added Enable Unstacking preset

 


BIG GIGANTIC NOTICE TO ALL USERS OF 1.0.0.0


 

By default, the new Enable Unstacking setting is set to False. That means that if you were happily using unstacking before, after you upgrade, unstacking will be disabled.

*** You must set Enable Unstacking to True to enable unstacking again. ***

None of your settings will be changed either way, this is just a big throw-switch to turn the whole feature on or off.

 

The motivation for this change was the observation that some admins are trying out the plugin and abandoning it due to complaints from players, no doubt in large part due to unstacking not being fine-tuned. So let's start everyone out with unstacking off and then admins who take the time to study the settings and learn how to fly his Space Shuttle cockpit complexity plugin can opt-in to using unstacking. I should have done this the first time around. You don't get a second chance at a first impression!

 

Screenshot of MULTIbalancer settings:

Posted Image

Papa, you are missing a few more settings. Then I'd say this photo would be applicable. :P
* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Originally Posted by HexaCanon*:

 

i think the only thing that makes it look complicated is that all modes are shown.

 

for example if i run only conquest large, there is really no need to have other modes shown.

 

so would it be possible in future version that all mode settings are collapsed by default and people will just manually enlarge the modes they need ?

* Restored post. It could be that the author is no longer active.
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Our picks

    • Game Server Hosting:

      We're happy to announce that EZRCON will branch out into the game server provider scene. This is a big step for us so please having patience if something doesn't go right in this area. Now, what makes us different compared to other providers? Well, we're going with the idea of having a scaleable server hosting and providing more control in how you set up your server. For example, in Minecraft, you have the ability to control how many CPU cores you wish your server to have access to, how much RAM you want to use, how much disk space you want to use. This type of control can't be offered in a single service package so you're able to configure a custom package the way you want it.

      You can see all the available games here. Currently, we have the following games available.

      Valheim (From $1.50 USD)


      Rust (From $3.20 USD)


      Minecraft (Basic) (From $4.00 USD)


      Call of Duty 4X (From $7.00 USD)


      OpenTTD (From $4.00 USD)


      Squad (From $9.00 USD)


      Insurgency: Sandstorm (From $6.40 USD)


      Changes to US-East:

      Starting in January 2022, we will be moving to a different provider that has better support, better infrastructure, and better connectivity. We've noticed that the connection/routes to this location are not ideal and it's been hard getting support to correct this. Our contract for our two servers ends in March/April respectively. If you currently have servers in this location you will be migrated over to the new provider. We'll have more details when the time comes closer to January. The new location for this change will be based out of Atlanta, GA. If you have any questions/concerns please open a ticket and we'll do our best to answer them.
      • 5 replies
    • Hello All,

      I wanted to give an update to how EZRCON is doing. As of today we have 56 active customers using the services offered. I'm glad its doing so well and it hasn't been 1 year yet. To those that have services with EZRCON, I hope the service is doing well and if not please let us know so that we can improve it where possible. We've done quite a few changes behind the scenes to improve the performance hopefully. 

      We'll be launching a new location for hosting procon layers in either Los Angeles, USA or Chicago, IL. Still being decided on where the placement should be but these two locations are not set in stone yet. We would like to get feedback on where we should have a new location for hosting the Procon Layers, which you can do by replying to this topic. A poll will be created where people can vote on which location they would like to see.

      We're also looking for some suggestions on what else you would like to see for hosting provider options. So please let us know your thoughts on this matter.
      • 4 replies
    • Added ability to disable the new API check for player country info


      Updated GeoIP database file


      Removed usage sending stats


      Added EZRCON ad banner



      If you are upgrading then you may need to add these two lines to your existing installation in the file procon.cfg. To enable these options just change False to True.

      procon.private.options.UseGeoIpFileOnly False
      procon.private.options.BlockRssFeedNews False



       
      • 2 replies
    • I wanted I let you know that I am starting to build out the foundation for the hosting services that I talked about here. The pricing model I was originally going for wasn't going to be suitable for how I want to build it. So instead I decided to offer each service as it's own product instead of a package deal. In the future, hopefully, I will be able to do this and offer discounts to those that choose it.

      Here is how the pricing is laid out for each service as well as information about each. This is as of 7/12/2020.

      Single MySQL database (up to 30 GB) is $10 USD per month.



      If you go over the 30 GB usage for the database then each additional gigabyte is charged at $0.10 USD each billing cycle. If you're under 30GB you don't need to worry about this.


      Databases are replicated across 3 zones (regions) for redundancy. One (1) on the east coast of the USA, One (1) in Frankfurt, and One (1) in Singapore. Depending on the demand, this would grow to more regions.


      Databases will also be backed up daily and retained for 7 days.




      Procon Layer will be $2 USD per month.


      Each layer will only allow one (1) game server connection. The reason behind this is for performance.


      Each layer will also come with all available plugins installed by default. This is to help facilitate faster deployments and get you up and running quickly.


      Each layer will automatically restart if Procon crashes. 


      Each layer will also automatically restart daily at midnight to make sure it stays in tip-top shape.


      Custom plugins can be installed by submitting a support ticket.




      Battlefield Admin Control Panel (BFACP) will be $5 USD per month


      As I am still working on building version 3 of the software, I will be installing the last version I did. Once I complete version 3 it will automatically be upgraded for you.





      All these services will be managed by me so you don't have to worry about the technical side of things to get up and going.

      If you would like to see how much it would cost for the services, I made a calculator that you can use. It can be found here https://ezrcon.com/calculator.html

       
      • 11 replies
    • I have pushed out a new minor release which updates the geodata pull (flags in the playerlisting). This should be way more accurate now. As always, please let me know if any problems show up.

       
      • 9 replies
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.